Right-Wing Authoritarianism
1. Authoritarian
submission -- a high degree of submission to the authorities who are
perceived to be established and legitimate in the society in which one lives.
2. Authoritarian
aggression -- a general aggressiveness, directed against various persons,
that is perceived to be sanctioned by established authorities.
3. Conventionalism
-- a high degree of adherence to the social conventions that are perceived to
be endorsed by society and its established authorities.
RWA Scale – Sample Items
[ Bob Altemeyer ]
1. Life imprisonment is justified for certain
crimes.
4. It is important to protect the rights of
radicals and deviants in all ways.
6. Gays and lesbians are just as healthy and
moral as anybody else.
9. The real keys to the “good life” are
obedience, discipline, and sticking to the straight and narrow.
14. There is no “ONE right way” to live
life; everybody has to create their own
way.
15. Our country will be destroyed someday if we
do not smash the perversions eating away at our moral fiber and traditional
beliefs.
21. What our country really needs is a strong,
determined leader who will crush evil, and take us back to our true path.
25. There is nothing wrong with premarital
sexual intercourse.
30. Obedience and respect for authority are the
most important virtues children should learn.
31. Nobody should “stick to the straight and
narrow.” Instead, people should break
loose and try out lots of different ideas and experiences.
34. The facts on crime, sexual immorality, and
the recent public disorders all show we have to crack down harder on deviant
groups and trouble-makers if we are going to save our moral standards and
preserve law and order.
RWA Correlations
Scales of ethnocentrism .40 - .50
Homeless are “lazy” not “unlucky” .40 - .55
Christian orthodoxy scale .40
- .60
Traditional gender roles .60
- .80
Sex: percent virgins high
RWA 60% - 70%
low RWA
30% - 40%
Scales of attitudes toward
homosexuals .60 - .70
Self-reported sexual aggression .35
Right to life .40
Acceptance of gov’t violation of rights .50 - .60
Agreement with attack on bill of
rights .40 - .50
Indifference to human rights
violations .60 - .70
“Posse against radicals” scale .40 - .50
Support “Rambo-like crusade”
against drugs .37
Length of sentences for criminals .40 -.50
[ but gave lighter sentences to policeman
who beat
protestor; officer who massacred
Vietnamese]
Belief in Nixon’s innocence .50
Conservative political parties
(including Communists in Russia) .20 - .40
[increases
among those with greater “interest” in politics]
Canadian provincial legislators
-- right vs. left .87
California legislators --
conservative vs. liberal .54
Opposition to environmental
movement .54
Factors
influencing RWA
· Family
background characteristics predictive of high RWA:
Strong
conventional religious orientation
Use
of physical punishment
Limited
personal experience with people unlike one’s self
· Education
lowers RWA scores
--
especially among initially high-scorers
· Parenthood
raises RWA scores somewhat
· 80s were a
period of higher RWA scores
· Social crises
raise RWA